The work people see from a design leader is the work that's easiest to describe. The one-on-ones. The creative direction. The decisions about who's ready for more. What's harder to describe — and what I'd argue is the actual job — is everything that happens before any of that becomes possible.
Most of the leadership that matters on a design team is invisible.
It happens in a conversation with a PM before a timeline becomes a crisis. It happens when you absorb an unrealistic ask and return with something workable, before it ever reaches the team. It happens when you sit with an executive's frustration about a design direction and translate it into something actionable rather than letting it land on your team as noise. The buffer isn't a metaphor. It's a daily practice. And it's one that rarely gets named as a leadership skill, because by definition, when it's working, no one knows it happened.
This doesn't mean protecting a team from reality. It means managing the volume of dysfunction that reaches them, so they can do the work they were hired to do. A design team that's constantly absorbing organisational turbulence doesn't produce its best work. Stability is a creative condition, not a soft one.
Hiring isn't just about talent. It's about architecture.
When I think about building a design team, the question isn't just who's good. It's what shape does this team need to be, and what does each person need to be able to become?
You can't hire all senior designers. Beyond the budget reality, it creates a team with no room to breathe — no one to mentor, no one to stretch, no tension between experience and ambition. Seniority means something when it's earned inside a team, not just imported. Junior designers need to grow into senior roles. Senior designers need to feel the pull toward something bigger than execution. The team shape creates those conditions, or it doesn't.
Feedback is a relationship, not a system.
Feedback that changes how someone works doesn't live in a document. It happens in a conversation — on a call, face to face — where you can read what's landing and adjust in real time.
What I try to hold consistently is the distinction between what's non-negotiable and what's a recommendation. There are design standards I won't move on. I'll say that clearly, and I'll say why. But within that, I want a designer to be able to defend their decisions — to push back, to justify, to show me something I missed. That exchange is where growth actually happens. If I'm the only one making calls, I'm not developing anyone. I'm just directing.
“Self-awareness isn't a personality trait. It's a professional skill.”
Growth requires a willingness to look inward.
The designers I've found hardest to develop aren't the ones with skill gaps. Skill gaps are solvable. The harder pattern is the designer who wants more responsibility, more ownership, more room — but when pressure arrives, the explanation is always external. The process failed. The brief was unclear. The timeline was unrealistic. Sometimes those things are true. But a designer who never turns that lens on themselves, who never asks what they could have done differently or what this moment is trying to teach them, has put a ceiling on their own growth. And no amount of support from a leader can lift it.
Self-awareness isn't a personality trait. It's a professional skill. And it's the one I watch for most carefully, because it determines what's actually possible for someone.
The signal I trust most for a healthy team is simple.
Energy. People who want to be there. Not performative enthusiasm — that burns out fast and reads as hollow. The quieter version: designers who bring problems, not just finished work. Who share things before they're ready. Who care about the outcome, not just the part of it they own. It's also easy to lose. Usually it erodes quietly, when a leader mistakes distance for empowerment.
In a remote environment especially, absence doesn't read as trust. It reads as disconnection. The best thing a design leader can do for a team's creative culture isn't to stay out of the way. It's to stay present in the right ways — the check-in that asks about life, not just the project. The conversation that reminds someone that the work matters and so do they, but that it is still, at the end of the day, work. That perspective — held lightly, offered at the right moment — is one of the more underrated things a leader can give someone who's in the weeds.
The visible work of design leadership is easy to put in a job description. The invisible work is what a team actually runs on.
Looking for more thought leadership?